:: Abstracts of Papers Dallas, 2009 ::

These abstracts vary considerably in length. Some of them are for the entire panel (hyperlinked to the panel title), some for individual papers (hyperlinked to the paper title). They were submitted before the conference, and may be changed to reflect more accurately what the panelist actually said. We post them here, however, because they allow one to get a quite good idea of what was said at the conference and far more quickly than was possible in the former system of publishing a summary by the chair in a newsletter that appeared some months later.

Friday, Session A

D.C. v. Heller and the Uses of History

  • David Konig, Washington University, <email>: “Once More Unto the Breach (or Breech?): The Asymmetries of Lawyer-Historian Debate”
  • Jack Rakove, Stanford University, <email>: “The Poverty of Public Meaning: Some Thoughts on D.C. v. Heller
  • Stephen Halbrook, <email>: “Reconstruction, the Second Amendment, and the Heller Decision”
  • Varieties of Editing: Pleasures and Pitfalls in Editing Pre-Modern Legal Documents

  • Patrick Nold, State University of New York at Albany, <email>: “Editing ‘Marriage Advice for a Pope’: Why do Medievalists Edit Texts and How Do They Do It?”
  • Peter Grund, University of Kansas, <email>: “Who Wrote What and When? The Charting of Recorders and the Editing of the Documents from the Salem Witch Trials”
  • Laura Culbertson, University of Michigan, <email>: “Modern Concepts and Ancient Procedures: Problems in the Translation of Sumerian Dispute Records”

  • International Borrowings

  • Kaius Tuori, University of Helsinki, <email>: “Colonialism, Spurious Traditions, and Modernization: American Law Professors and the Downfall of African Customary Law”
  • Charlotte Walker, Yale University, <email>: “Manipulating the State: Legal Evolutions and the Emergence of Corruption in Colonial Cameroon”
  • Marie Seong-Hak Kim, St. Cloud State University, <email>: “The Sources of Law in the Korean Civil Code”
  • Gender, Soldiering, and Citizenship in the Twentieth Century United States

  • Rebecca Rix, Princeton University, <email>: “‘No Longer the Men of Lexington’: Unfit Draftees and the Changing Meaning of ‘the General Welfare’ During World War I”
  • Melissa Murray, University of California, Berkeley <email>: “‘Made with Men in Mind’: Veterans’ Benefits, Gender, and Social Policy”
  • Serena Mayeri, University of Pennsylvania, <email>: “Preferred Veterans, Prison Guards, and Pregnant Workers: Attacking ‘Disparate Impact’ in the 1970s”
  • Slave, Freeman, and Citizen in Antebellum America

  • Kristen Foster, Marquette University, <email>: “Creating the American Citizen: A look at the Impact of the Haitian Revolution on American Ideas about Equality”
  • Kelly Kennington, Duke University, <email>: “Slavery and Freedom in the Antebellum St. Louis Courts”
  • H. Robert Baker, Georgia State <email>: “The Prigg Fallacy: The Use of Constitutional History to Legitimate Constitutional Law”
  • Friday, Session B

    Civilizing and Un-Civilizing War in the Nineteenth Century

  • Stephen Neff, University of Edinburgh, <email>: “Partisans, Prowlers and Guerrillas: Historical Roots of International Law on Unlawful Belligerency”
  • James Whitman, Yale University, <email>: “The Breakdown of Battle Culture, from Waterloo to Sedan”
  • John Witt, Yale University, <email>: “Rules of Wrong: The Crisis of the Laws of War in the Age of Democratic Ideals”
  • Year Books and Plea Rolls On-Line: Seipp’s Abridgement and Palmer’s AALT

  • David Seipp, Boston University, <email>: “The Year Books Database and After: What More Do We Need?”
  • Robert Palmer, University of Houston, <email>: “The AALT: Usage, Projection, and the Role of the Reader”
  • Circumnavigating the Pacific: The United States and the Philippines, 1898–1945

  • Nancy Buenger, University of Chicago, <email>: “Home Rule: Equitable Justice in Chicago and the Philippines, 1898-1917”
  • Anna Leah Fidelis Castañeda, Harvard University, <email>: “A Pacific ‘Quest for Power’: Governor General Forbes and the Rise of the Philippine Assembly, 1907-1913”
  • Christopher Capozzola, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, <email>: “A Tale of Two Treasons: Adjudicating War Crimes and Collaboration in Manila, 1945”
  • Gendered Murder on Trial in Australia, England, and the United States

  • Marianne Constable, University of California, Berkeley, <email>: “‘The Justification was Perfect’—Jessie Hopkins’ Acquittal”
  • Carolyn B. Ramsey, University of Colorado, <email>: “Violence and Respectability: Intimate-Partner Homicide in Australia and the American West, 1860-1930 “
  • Martha Merrill Umphrey, Amherst College, <email>: “Reconstructing Responsibility: Narrating Violence in the Trials of Harry K. Thaw”
  • Martin Wiener, Rice University, <email>: “The New Leniency Towards Female Murderers in Victorian England”
  • The Long Cold War

  • Jennifer Uhlmann, Washington University <email>: “The Communist Contribution to Constitutional Law”
  • Brad Snyder, University of Wisconsin, <email>: “A Great Case Not Taken: The Forgotten History of the Rosenberg Case”
  • Anders Walker, St. Louis University, <email>: “‘The End of America’: Lewis F. Powell’s Russian Revelation”
  • Friday, Session C

    Sources of Law in 15th-18th Century Europe: A Panel in Honor of Joe McKnight

  • Amalia Kessler, Stanford University, <email>: “The Law Merchant in Old Regime France”
  • Emily Kadens, University of Texas, <email>: “The Myth of Spontaneous Law”
  • Alan Watson, University of Georgia, <email>: “Sources of Law in Early Modern Europe”
  • Kathryn T. Preyer Prize Panel

  • Cary Franklin, Yale University, <email>: “Sex Roles and the Foundations of Constitutional Sex Discrimination Law”
  • Elizabeth Katz, University of Virginia, <email>: “‘Wife Beating’ and ‘Uninvited Kisses’ in the Supreme Court and Society in the Early Twentieth Century”

  • The Preyer Scholars did not submit abstracts; rather they submitted their entire papers to the selection committee.

    Emancipation, Enslavement, and Identity in the Age of Atlantic Revolutions

  • Alejandro de la Fuente, University of Pittsburgh, <email>: and Ariela Gross, University of Southern: California, <email>: “Comparing Law and Racial Identity under Slavery in Colonial Cuba, Louisiana and Virginia”
  • Malick Ghachem, Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, <email>: “Prosecuting Torture: Risk and Revolution in an Eighteenth-Century Slave Colony”
  • Rebecca J. Scott, University of Michigan, <email>: “Paper Thin: Freedom, Re-enslavement, and Contests over the Attribution of Legal Status”
  • Manly Madness: Honor, Manhood, and Responsibility in the American Courtroom

  • Susanna Blumenthal, University of Minnesota, <email>: “Suicidal Salesmen: Accounting for Self-Killing in Nineteenth-Century Life Insurance Litigation”
  • Rachel Ponce, University of Chicago, <email>: “‘Chimerical Dogmas’: Honor and Insanity in Nineteenth- Century American Law”
  • Carolyn Strange, Australian National University, <email>: “Mind, Motive and Masculinity: Killing the Father to Save the Family”
  • Wartime Administration and the Rule of Law: The Case of the United States in the 1940s

  • Mark Wilson, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, <email>: “‘Taking a Nickel Out of the Cash Register’: Statutory Renegotiation of Military Contracts and the Politics of Profit Control in the USA During World War II”
  • Joanna Grisinger, Clemson University, <email>: “The Office of Price Administration and the War at Home”
  • Karen Tani, University of Pennsylvania, <email>: “Administering ‘Welfare Rights’: ‘Fair Hearings’ in Public Assistance in the 1940s”
  • Saturday, Session A

    Race, Law, and the Local in Nineteenth Century America

  • Laura Edwards, Duke University, <email>: “Individual Rights and the Transformation of Slave Law, 1787-1860”
  • Martha Jones, University of Michigan, <email>: “Overturning Dred Scott v. Sandford: African American Citizenship in the Antebellum City
  • Dylan Penningroth, Northwestern University, <email>: “Law and the Black Church in the Jim Crow South”
  • Law and Drama in Athens

  • Judith Fletcher, Wilfrid Laurier University, <email>: “The Incompetent Jurors of Aeschylus’ ‘Agamemnon’”
  • Adele Scafuro, Brown University, <email>: “Euripides’ ‘Orestes’ (408 BCE) and the Rule of Law”
  • Jess Miner, College of Charleston, <email>: “No Laughing Matter: Comic Characterization in the Courts at Athens”
  • Law and Markets

  • Daniel Klerman, University of Southern California, <email>: “Legal Fictions as Strategic Instruments” [no abstract]
  • Sachin Pandya, University of Connecticut, <email>: “The First Liability Insurance Cartel in America”
  • Jérôme Sgard, Sciences Po Paris, <email>: “The History of Market Discipline: Bankruptcy, Renegotiation, and Debt Discharge in England and France”
  • National Sovereignty and Allegiance in the Age of Mass Migration

  • Lucy Salyer, University of New Hampshire, <email>: “Exits: Forming International Rules on Expatriation”
  • Matthew Lindsay, Harvard University, <email>: “A Power 'Inherent in Sovereignty and Essential to Self- Preservation': National Security and the Origins of the Federal Immigration Power”
  • Candice Bredbenner, University of North Carolina, Wilmington, <email>: “Pacifists, Naturalization, and the Rebirth of the ‘Attachment’ Standard”
  • Judicial Power and Judicial Politics in the Early Nineteenth Century

  • Alison LaCroix, University of Chicago, <email>: “Federalists, Federalism, and Federal Jurisdiction, 1802-1835”
  • Kristin Collins, Boston University, <email>: “Federal Equity Power, Judicial Lawmaking, and the Process Acts”
  • Jed Handelsman Shugerman, Harvard University, <email>: “Economic Crises and Two Revolutions for Judicial Independence: The 1830s-40s and the 1930s-40s”
  • Saturday, Session B

    Thomas Sugrue, Sweet Land of Liberty: The Forgotten Struggle for Civil Rights in the North

  • Mark Tushnet, Harvard University, <email>
  • Risa: Goluboff, University of Virginia, email>
  • Adrienne Davis, Washington University, email>
  • Gary Gerstle, Vanderbilt University, email>
  • Rational Choice Approaches to Ancient Law

  • Melissa Schwartzberg, Columbia University, <email>: “Voting and Judgment in Assemblies and Juries in Classical Athens”
  • Dennis Kehoe, Tulane University, <email>: “Economic Incentives and Risk in Roman Contract Law”
  • Bruce Frier, University of Michigan, <email>: “Institutional Constraints on Rational Choice: The Case of Roman Dowry”
  • Exploring the Distinctiveness of Canadian Legal History

  • Jim Phillips, University of Toronto, <email>: “The Origins of Canada’s Regulatory Takings Doctrine”
  • Lyndsay Campbell, University of Calgary, <email>: “Policing Decency: Obscene, Immoral, and Indecent Literature in Early 19th-Century Nova Scotia and Massachusetts”
  • Hamar Foster, University of Victoria, <email>: “One Good Thing: Law and Elevator Etiquette in the Indian Territories”
  • Shelley Gavigan, York University, <email>: “High Law, Low Law, and Discourses of Criminalization: Aboriginal Women and Girls in the Criminal Court on the
  • Canadian Plains, 1876-1903”
  • Wesley Pue, University of British Columbia, <email>: “The Martin Case, Communism and Professionalism”
  • Blurred Sovereignties: U.S. Law at the Edge

  • Michael Willrich, Brandeis University, <email>: “War is Health: U.S. Military Medicine and Police Power at the Edges of Empire”
  • Rachel St. John, Harvard University, <email>: “Between Nations: American Capitalists and the Politics of Corporate Nationality on the Baja California Border, 1900–1930
  • Andrew Wender Cohen, Syracuse University, <email>: “The Perils of Inspection: Smuggling, Globalism, and the Right to Privacy”
  • The Law of Administration in the Early American Republic

  • Nicholas Parrillo, Yale University, <email>: “The Rise of Non-Profit Government in America: Incentives, Scandal, and Discretionary Judgment”
  • James Pfander, Northwestern University, <email>: “Public Wrongs and Private Bills: Legislative Indemnification and Official Compliance with Law”
  • Gautham Rao, Rutgers University/New Jersey Institute of Technology, <email>: “Administrative Law’s Scandalous Past: Rethinking Jefferson’s Embargo”
  • Saturday, Session C

    Temporality in Legal History

  • Christopher Tomlins, American Bar Foundation, <email>: “Representations of Law and Justice: The American Mainland, from ‘Beginning’ to ‘End’”
  • Kunal Parker, Cleveland State University, <email>: “Thinking ‘Historically’ About Law: Legal Modernism and its Antecedents”
  • Mary Dudziak, University of Southern California, <email>: “Law, War, and the History of Time”
  • Exceptional Women in the Medieval Courtroom

  • Marie Kelleher, California State University, Long Beach, <email>: “Facing off from the Margins: Female Slaves and Jews in Medieval Procedural Law”
  • Jamie Smith, Alma College, <email>: “Avoiding Great Harm, Danger, and Absurdity: Legal Protection for Wives with Absent Husbands”
  • Sara McDougall, Yale University, <email>: “Abandoned Wives and the Law in Late-Medieval Champagne”
  • International Law and the Periphery

  • Arnulf Becker Lorca, King’s College London, <email>: “International Law in the Periphery 1850-1900: The Internalization of the Standard of Civilization and the Appropriation of the European Legal Tradition”
  • James Thuo Gathii, Albany Law School, <email>: “Elias T. Olawale’s Project of Re-Writing International Legal History to Acknowledge Africa’s Contribution”
  • Carl Landauer, University of California, Berkeley, <email>: “Imaging India and International Law in Nagendra Singh’s ‘India and International Law’”
  • Ambiguities of Citizenship

  • Christina Duffy Burnett, Columbia University, <email>: “Citizenship in the Time of Empire: The Non-Citizen National in Constitutional and International Law”
  • Linda Kerber, University of Iowa, <email>: “Americans and the UN Statelessness Conventions”
  • David Abraham, University of Miami, <email>: “Is Citizenship Worthwhile? Membership and Insecurity in America”
  • American Philanthropies and Socio-Legal Change

  • Elisabeth Anderson, Northwestern University, <email>: “Expert Jurisdiction and Social Problems: The Russell Sage Foundation and Poor People’s Credit in Early 20th-Century America”
  • Maribel Morey, Princeton University, <email>: “The Making of ‘An American Dilemma’ (1944): The Carnegie Corporation President’s Decision to Fund a Negro Study, 1923-1937”
  • Bryant Garth, Southwestern University, <email>: “Elite Civilizers of Empire: Philanthropic Foundations in the Cold War and After”
  • Saturday, Session D

    Crimes Against Peace and Humanity: Poland, Germany, Rwanda

  • Catherine Epstein, Amherst College, <email>: “Nazis in Polish Courtrooms: The 1946 Trial of Arthur Greiser”
  • Devin Pendas, Boston College, <email>: “Transitional Justice in Germany, 1945-1950: Ironies, Paradoxes and Unintended Consequences”
  • Jens Meierhenrich, Harvard University, <email>: “Lawfare”
  • A Comparative History of Family Law

  • Gail Savage, St. Mary’s College of Maryland, <email>: “Regulation and De-Regulation of Family Life: Family Law in a Comparative Perspective” [no abstract]
  • Holly Brewer, North Carolina State University, <email>: “Transforming Coverture: Contesting Personal and Political Authority in Early Modern England and America”
  • Varsha Chitnis, Ohio State University, <email>: “Family Law and Colonialism in Nineteenth-Century India” [no abstract]
  • The Aftermath of Financial Crises

  • Julia Rudolph, University of Pennsylvania, <email>: “Women, Moral Sense, and the Critique of Equity” [no abstract]
  • Frank Partnoy, University of San Diego, <email>: “Historical Perspectives on the Financial Crisis: Ivar Kreuger, Credit Rating Agencies, and the Impetus for the Securities >Laws”
  • Dror Goldberg, Bar Ilan University, <email>: “The Invention of Fiat Money”
  • Litigation Strategies of Social Movements

  • Henning Grunwald, Vanderbilt University, <email>: “From Courtroom to Revolutionary Stage: Party Lawyers and Political Justice in the Weimar Republic”
  • Linda Upham-Bornstein, Plymouth State University, <email>: “The Hammer of Justice: Taxpayers’ Litigation and Political Reform in New York City, 1900 - 1930”
  • Joel Black, University of Florida, <email>: “Economic Rights and Community Membership in Black Industrial Chicago, 1890-1930”
  • Megan Francis, University of Chicago, <email>: “The Improbable Journey: The NAACP Launches the Modern Criminal Procedure Revolution”
  • Biography and Legal History

  • Catharine MacMillan, Queen Mary University of London, <email>: “Judah Benjamin: An Émigré Barrister and International Law”
  • Grant Morris, Victoria University of Wellington, <email>: “Chief Justice James Prendergast and the Treaty of Waitangi: Judicial Attitudes to the Treaty in New Zealand during the Latter Half of the Nineteenth Century”
  • David Marcus, University of Arizona, <email>: “Charles Clark, Legal Realism, and the Jurisprudential Basis of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure”
  • Polly Price, Emory University, <email>: “‘The Intensely Practical Nature of the Political Process’: Judge Richard S. Arnold’s Legislative Role in the Third Branch”

  • WEB QUESTIONS? CONTACT WEBMASTER@LEGALHISTORIAN.ORG
    © 1995-2009 American Society for Legal History, Inc.

    URL: http://www.legalhistorian.org/conferences/2009conference/abstracts/index.shtml
    last modified:  11/30/09